Ruwebit
HARDWARE REVIEWS, DIY PROJECTS, IN-DEPTH ARTICLES
Start DIY projectsReviewsHow-to'sNewsAutomotiveAbout the websiteArchive | Most popularLast updatedTags Sitemap
foscamnews
Newer Foscam FI8908W cameras now are easier to distinguish from fakes
Download article as PDF
By Maurice on May 2 popularity:
I recently bought two original Foscam's controllable IP cameras. A black and white one. The white one seems to be produced later than the black one and is easier to distinguish from 'fake' ones.

First let's discuss the term 'fake'. Foscam is an OEM. Which means it sells unbranded webcams to thirdparties, which sell it under their own brand. So, they are essentially the same cameras but probably with different, custom firmware. There are also cameras from other manufacturers that replicated the Foscams, these are 'the real' fakes. But in all cases it is very important to flash only the firmware from the real manufacturer of your camera.

You probably want to go for a real Foscam, because of the quality of their product, their support, their regular firmware updates and the compatibility amongst all kind of applications (like iPhone apps to control your camera, or Zoneminder for Linux).

GadgetVictims already has a great article on how to distinguish real Foscams from 'fakes'. But Foscam listened to their users and now even makes it easier.

The Foscam brand now is printed on the camera (not a sticker)
The box now carries the Foscam logo

There also seems to be some improvements, because the newer camera I have is less sensitive to poor wireless network conditions. It also sees channel 13 and 14 (I'm not sure if this is maybe due to the fact that I bought the new one in my own country and the old one overseas in the UK).

If you are new to Foscam cameras, check this out.

Pictures

White is the newer camera (mounted to the ceiling), the black is the older one. I use the firmware 11.14.1.46 and Web UI 2.4.8.12 bis on both of them. In the the 2.4.8.12 bis WebGUI the tilt up functionality seems to be a bit broken. It reports two javascript errors (in both Firefox and Chrome): "support on mousedown event" and "support decoder_control function". The camera then moves up anyway, but has to be stopped with an extra click on the stop button.





Click here for the complete album and sub-albums


Copyright © 1999-2010 by Maurice de Bijl. This article was published on 2010-05-02 in foscam  news

Was this article useful to you? Please help me by using the toolbar below to tweet the article, give it an eKudo or add it to Hyves, Facebook, Delicous, Digg or another site. Thanks!

Download article as PDF

Comments on this article

There are no comments on this article yet. You can be first.

Add comment

Adding a comment is simple and registration is not needed!

Your IP address is logged, but will not published, all comments need E-mail confirmation and are moderated one by one. Abuse is not tolerated. It is not possible to edit your comment afterwards.

Name:
E-mail address:

E-mail is only used for validation and will not published.

Comment:

Please write comments in the language of the article (English) HTML is not allowed BB-code tags are.

POLL
What do you think of the site design?


Vote View

Please help me by voting
POPULAR TAGS
Show all tags
SEARCH KEYWORD
FOLLOW ME
TwitterGoogleRSSMail
TWITTERING
INFORMATION
Contents and design copyright © 1999-2010 by Maurice de Bijl.

This page has been requested 2082 times and is generated on 07-09-2010 19:05:21 CET in 78.27 msec op srv010106.webreus.nl, scripts revision# 1:23M

This site is best viewed with Firefox 3.0 or later, Opera 10.5 or later, Safari 3.0 or later or Safari on iPhone, Chrome 4 or later or Internet Explorer 9 or later

Valid HTML 4.01 TransitionalValid CSS!